<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ace on Tech - Latest Comments in High Hopes for Office Web Apps</title><link>http://ace-on-tech.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ace-on-tech.disqus.com/high_hopes_for_office_web_apps/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:43:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: High Hopes for Office Web Apps</title><link>http://aceontech.com/2009/08/27/high-hopes-for-office-web-apps/#comment-15544071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Thurrott seems to be enthusiastic about Office Web Apps. I tend to&lt;br&gt;believe him. And he's pretty much the only one with hands-on experience,&lt;br&gt;too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: High Hopes for Office Web Apps</title><link>http://aceontech.com/2009/08/27/high-hopes-for-office-web-apps/#comment-15521127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given that Office Web Apps are also 100% Javascript (notwithstanding the optional use of Silverlight), there is a good chance that Microsoft will face the same issues as Google during roundtripping across the desktop and browser (since they need to convert the Office format to HTML too - "half assed" or otherwise!&lt;br&gt;It will definitely be interesting to see if they have handled this more elegantly than the likes of Google...but given Microsoft's track record with web apps, probably better not to get your hopes up too high at this point!&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Sumanth&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sumanthr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>